Kalba

© 2026 Temidy. Visos teisės saugomos.

CASE OF BOLJEVIĆ AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO

Bylos numeris

21609/20

Data

2024-04-25

Teismas

Europos Žmogaus Teisių Teismas

Bylos tipas

COMMITTEE

Šalys

BOLJEVIĆ AND OTHERS - applicant
MONTENEGRO - respondent

Teisėjai

Teisėjų informacija nepateikta

FIRST SECTION

CASE OF BOLJEVIĆ AND OTHERS v. MONTENEGRO

(Application no. 21609/20)

JUDGMENT

This version was rectified on 27 June 2024

under Rule 81 of the Rules of Court.

STRASBOURG

25 April 2024

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.

In the case of Boljević and Others v. Montenegro,

The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:

Péter Paczolay, President, Gilberto Felici, Raffaele Sabato, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 4 April 2024,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE

1. The case originated in an application against Montenegro lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on 10 April 2020.

2. The applicants were represented by Mr B. Ćupić, a lawyer practising in Podgorica.

3. The Montenegrin Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the application.

THE FACTS

4. The applicants’ details and information relevant to the application are set out in the appended table.

5. The applicants complained of the non-enforcement of domestic decisions given against socially/State-owned companies.

6. On 18 July 2019 the Constitutional Court found a violation of the applicants’ rights under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 to the Convention on account of non-enforcement. The applicants were awarded 2,000 euros (EUR) each in non-pecuniary damage. However, the domestic decisions under consideration remain unenforced until the present day.

THE LAW

7. The applicants complained principally of the non-enforcement of domestic decisions given in their favour. They relied on Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and on Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

Norite matyti visą bylą?

Užsiregistruokite nemokamai per 30 sekundžių ir skaitykite visą bylą be apribojimų

Temidy turi daugiau nei 2405342 teismų bylų

Susijusios bylos

  • CASE OF ALBANESE AND OTHERS v. ITALY
    Byla Nr. 38583/13 · Europos Žmogaus Teisių Teismas · 2024-04-25
  • CASE OF USACHENKO AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
    Byla Nr. 69557/13 · Europos Žmogaus Teisių Teismas · 2024-04-25
  • CASE OF ANTROPOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
    Byla Nr. 1434/18;10211/20;28522/21;28817/21;28821/21;28822/21;28823/21;28837/21;28839/21;29793/21;30174/21;30179/21;30233/21;30351/21;30425/21;30630/21;30809/21;31543/21;31710/21;33564/21;33566/21;33570/21;33607/21;33608/21;33611/21;58683/21;45367/22;45792/22;480/23;1548/23 · Europos Žmogaus Teisių Teismas · 2024-04-25
  • CASE OF NELYUBIN AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
    Byla Nr. 2064/18;48440/19;56348/21;56417/21;56508/21;56929/21;13739/22;46008/22;46501/22;47023/22;47136/22;47989/22;49312/22 · Europos Žmogaus Teisių Teismas · 2024-04-25
  • CASE OF ZĂGREANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
    Byla Nr. 20550/18;15599/20;21505/20;47824/20;53319/20;12442/21 · Europos Žmogaus Teisių Teismas · 2024-04-25